AMD Ryzen 5 2600 + GeForce GTX 1660

Processor

AMD Ryzen 5 2600

13,216
CPU Mark
Faster than 79% of 1,255
9.75 % BOTTLENECK
Well matched
Graphics card

GeForce GTX 1660

11,716
G3D Mark
Faster than 67% of 268
Limiting part

The AMD Ryzen 5 2600 paired with the GeForce GTX 1660 produces a 9.75% bottleneck. The two parts are well matched, so neither spends meaningful time waiting on the other. Nothing here needs fixing.

Every build has a bottleneck; the question is only whether it sits where you want it. Read the figure alongside the limiting part, because the same percentage means different things at 1080p and at 4K.

Estimated FPS at 1080p, high preset

Ranges, not exact figures: identical builds vary by roughly a quarter in real use depending on drivers, thermals and background load. Bars are scaled against the fastest title here, and each row states which component sets its ceiling.

Every title here is GPU-limited on this pairing.

Fortnite 126-211FPS
CS:GO 206-344FPS
GTA V 76-126FPS
Apex Legends 81-135FPS
PUBG 82-137FPS

Method: estimated from measured GPU baseline framerates and PassMark CPU scores, capped by whichever component limits first. Workload factors derived from the OpenML "fps-in-video-games" dataset (CC-BY, Sven Peeters).

AMD Ryzen 5 2600 and GeForce GTX 1660: FPS by game and resolution

High preset. Each cell is a range; the label marks which component sets the ceiling. Blank cells mean this pairing has no measured data for that combination, and nothing is estimated in.

Game 720p 1080p 1440p
Fortnite 134-223 GPU 126-211 GPU 89-149 GPU
CS:GO 197-328 GPU 206-344 GPU 144-241 GPU
PUBG 92-153 GPU 82-137 GPU 68-114 GPU
GTA V 79-132 CPU 76-126 GPU 55-92 GPU
Apex Legends - 81-135 GPU -
Overwatch - 124-207 GPU 89-149 GPU
League of Legends - 164-273 GPU -
Call of Duty: Black Ops 4 - 83-138 GPU -
Battlefield 1 - 83-138 GPU -
Battlefield 4 - 104-173 GPU -
Rust - 63-105 GPU -
Minecraft - 187-311 GPU -
World of Tanks - 98-164 CPU -
ARK: Survival Evolved - 59-98 GPU -

How quality settings affect this build: Fortnite at 1080p

Dropping settings only helps while the GPU is the limit. Once the label reads CPU, lowering quality stops buying frames on this pairing.

Every preset here is GPU-limited, which is exactly why the bars barely move.

Low 161-268FPS
Medium 153-256FPS
High 126-211FPS
Max 89-149FPS

Bottleneck by resolution

Raising resolution shifts load from the CPU to the GPU, so the balance of this pairing changes with the display it drives. Note this measures imbalance, not speed: the lowest figure is usually the lowest resolution, which is not the one to play at. Read it alongside the limiting part.

Smallest imbalance 1280x720 9.1% bottleneck · CPU-limited
Largest imbalance 7680x4620 18.1% bottleneck · GPU-limited

On this chart a longer bar is worse: it measures imbalance, not speed.

1280x720 9.1%
CPU-limited
1366x768 9.2%
CPU-limited
1600x900 9.3%
balanced
1920x1080 9.6%
balanced
2560x1440 your setting 9.8%
GPU-limited
3840x2160 11.7%
GPU-limited
5120x2880 13.5%
GPU-limited
7680x4620 18.1%
GPU-limited

How these parts rank

Position within the 1,255 processors and 268 graphics cards in our database, by the same benchmark scores this calculator runs on.

Processor AMD Ryzen 5 2600 Faster than 79% of CPUs listed · #260 of 1,255
Graphics card GeForce GTX 1660 Faster than 67% of GPUs listed · #88 of 268

Upgrade options

ASUS ROG Strix NVIDIA GeForce RTX™ 4070 Ti

$1050 Check price

AMD Ryzen 7 5800X

Intel Core i7-13700K

Related pairings

Other processors with the GeForce GTX 1660

Other graphics cards with the AMD Ryzen 5 2600

Try a different pairing

Swap either component and see how the balance moves. Changing the resolution alone often matters more than changing a part.

Run another build

Similar calculations