Intel Core i5-10400F @ 2.90GHz + GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER

Processor

Intel Core i5-10400F @ 2.90GHz

12,232
CPU Mark
Faster than 78% of 1,255
Limiting part
9.5 % BOTTLENECK
Well matched
Graphics card

GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER

12,788
G3D Mark
Faster than 69% of 268

The Intel Core i5-10400F @ 2.90GHz paired with the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER produces a 9.5% bottleneck. The two parts are well matched, so neither spends meaningful time waiting on the other. Nothing here needs fixing.

Every build has a bottleneck; the question is only whether it sits where you want it. Read the figure alongside the limiting part, because the same percentage means different things at 1080p and at 4K.

Estimated FPS at 1080p, high preset

Ranges, not exact figures: identical builds vary by roughly a quarter in real use depending on drivers, thermals and background load. Bars are scaled against the fastest title here, and each row states which component sets its ceiling.

Every title here is GPU-limited on this pairing.

Fortnite 134-223FPS
CS:GO 219-365FPS
GTA V 80-134FPS
Apex Legends 86-143FPS
PUBG 87-145FPS

Method: estimated from measured GPU baseline framerates and PassMark CPU scores, capped by whichever component limits first. Workload factors derived from the OpenML "fps-in-video-games" dataset (CC-BY, Sven Peeters).

Intel Core i5-10400F @ 2.90GHz and GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER: FPS by game and resolution

High preset. Each cell is a range; the label marks which component sets the ceiling. Blank cells mean this pairing has no measured data for that combination, and nothing is estimated in.

Game 720p 1080p 1440p
Fortnite 140-233 CPU 134-223 GPU 95-158 GPU
CS:GO 208-347 GPU 219-365 GPU 153-255 GPU
PUBG 92-153 CPU 87-145 GPU 72-120 GPU
GTA V 78-130 CPU 80-134 GPU 58-97 GPU
Apex Legends - 86-143 GPU -
Overwatch - 132-219 GPU 95-158 GPU
League of Legends - 174-289 GPU -
Call of Duty: Black Ops 4 - 88-146 GPU -
Battlefield 1 - 88-146 GPU -
Battlefield 4 - 110-183 GPU -
Rust - 67-112 GPU -
Minecraft - 198-330 GPU -
World of Tanks - 98-163 CPU -
ARK: Survival Evolved - 62-104 GPU -

How quality settings affect this build: Fortnite at 1080p

Dropping settings only helps while the GPU is the limit. Once the label reads CPU, lowering quality stops buying frames on this pairing.

Every preset here is GPU-limited, which is exactly why the bars barely move.

Low 170-283FPS
Medium 162-271FPS
High 134-223FPS
Max 95-158FPS

Bottleneck by resolution

Raising resolution shifts load from the CPU to the GPU, so the balance of this pairing changes with the display it drives. Note this measures imbalance, not speed: the lowest figure is usually the lowest resolution, which is not the one to play at. Read it alongside the limiting part.

Smallest imbalance 1280x720 9.5% bottleneck · CPU-limited
Largest imbalance 7680x4620 18.8% bottleneck · GPU-limited

On this chart a longer bar is worse: it measures imbalance, not speed.

1280x720 your setting 9.5%
CPU-limited
1366x768 9.6%
CPU-limited
1600x900 9.7%
CPU-limited
1920x1080 10.0%
balanced
2560x1440 10.2%
GPU-limited
3840x2160 12.2%
GPU-limited
5120x2880 14.1%
GPU-limited
7680x4620 18.8%
GPU-limited

How these parts rank

Position within the 1,255 processors and 268 graphics cards in our database, by the same benchmark scores this calculator runs on.

Processor Intel Core i5-10400F @ 2.90GHz Faster than 78% of CPUs listed · #277 of 1,255
Graphics card GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER Faster than 69% of GPUs listed · #83 of 268

Upgrade options

ASUS ROG Strix NVIDIA GeForce RTX™ 4070 Ti

$1050 Check price

AMD Ryzen 7 5800X

Intel Core i7-13700K

Related pairings

Other processors with the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER

Other graphics cards with the Intel Core i5-10400F @ 2.90GHz

Try a different pairing

Swap either component and see how the balance moves. Changing the resolution alone often matters more than changing a part.

Run another build

Similar calculations